1.
Benjamin Huntsman – Early
Life
2.
Benjamin Huntsman and the world
of eighteenth-century science
3.
Early Eighteenth-Century Steel Production
4.
Furnaces
5.
Industrial Secrecy and Espionage
6. Opposition of the Sheffield
cutlers
7. Huntsman’s works at Handsworth
and Attercliffe
8.
Swedish Visits to the Attercliffe
Works
9.
The evolution of the Attercliffe
Works in the later 18th Century
|
4. Development of the furnace
After almost a decade of experimentation, Huntsman
had achieved a scale and quality of production that was commercially
viable. In 1751 he established his first purpose-built works at
Attercliffe, a village on the outskirts of Sheffield, at a time
when his process had become one of the most sought after industrial
secrets of the eighteenth century. Numerous attempts were made
to discover it both at home and from abroad, and by the 1760s
his first serious commercial competitors were operating furnaces
in Sheffield.
The theft of Huntsman's secret is represented by two distinct
traditions. Of these, the best known is the story of the shivering
beggar who arrived at Huntsman's furnaces on a freezing winter
night in search of shelter and warmth.
Steel melting was at that time covertly carried out during the
hours of darkness, and the sympathetic furnace-men on duty allowed
the stranger to rest in the warmth of the melting shop. However,
the beggar was in reality one of Huntsman's competitors, Samuel
Walker, and by feigning sleep he observed the whole process, learning
enough that on his departure the following morning he took the
secret with him. He immediately set to work building his own furnaces
and was soon producing steel to rival Huntsman's.
This oral tradition is supported to a certain extent by documentary
evidence. In 1750, Samuel Walker built a "House and Furnace
for refining steel in at Grenoside", taken to be the result
of his subterfuge. However, it was not until 1771 that any further
furnaces were built by Walker which suggests that the original
furnace had met with limited success.
On the other hand, the date of 1750 or earlier would locate the
espionage at Handsworth, where the furnaces directly adjoined
Huntsman's cottage, making it less likely that such a simple ruse
could have succeeded, particularly as the furnace hands had all
been "pledged to inviolable secrecy".
The second lesser-known but more sinister account portrays Huntsman
as the recipient of the secret and first appeared in a short book
Essays on Iron and Steel (1773) by Henry Horne, a London cutler.
Surprisingly he made no mention of Huntsman's name in connection
with crucible steel, but instead ascribed the invention to a mysterious
"gentleman residing in the Temple" who subsequently
passed on the secret to a gold lace maker, "one Waller from
London", who employed it to make improved steel rollers for
flattening gold wire.
Dissatisfied with success in his own trade, Waller contracted
a cutler of Covent Garden to manufacture cast steel razors. Due
to the high mirror polish of the steel, these proved popular and
Waller soon acquired "a pretty large number of customers
at the west end of the town, where he became a considerable hawker".
His unexpected success alarmed the other razor manufacturers,
and a number of them conspired to build their own steel furnace
and break Waller's monopoly.
The book's author, Henry Horne, took up the challenge and, despite
considerable difficulties, claimed to be soon producing steel
"vastly superior" to Waller's, with which he supplied
the London cutlers "at a very moderate price".
Faced with this competition, Waller left for the North of England
with the intention of selling the secret at the highest price.
Finding no takers at Birmingham, he continued to Sheffield where
after several rejections, he met "some keen friends"
who extracted the secret from him for a sum of money, and were
soon producing superior steel to Waller. It was not long before
Horne found his customers turning to Sheffield, where they could
purchase steel from eight to ten pence a pound, undercutting his
own trade.
With a clear interest in the affair, Horne's version of events
cannot be regarded as impartial, and as such has been often discredited.
Horne certainly manufactured cast steel, although there is nothing
in his account to suggest a date earlier than 1765, by which time
others in Sheffield were also practising the art.
John Waller himself published a pamphlet in which he claimed to
have discovered the steel casting process towards the end of 1737,
some years prior to Huntsman. Although his account betrays a practical
appreciation of the problems that he would have encountered in
attempting the process -- including the identification of crucible
manufacture as a key secret -- most of his claims are unsupportable.
Waller claimed to have presented his findings before the Royal
Society, although no records survive to confirm this. However,
it does correspond to another oral tradition in the Huntsman story,
in which Huntsman is said to have turned down the offer of a Fellowship
by the Royal Society due to his Quaker principles.
The truth probably incorporates elements from all of the above
stories. It is likely that the Royal Society, having heard of
Huntsman's invention, invited him sometime around 1750 to present
his findings with the possibility of a fellowship. At this stage,
some details of the process may have been transmitted in confidence
to a small group of Fellows, including the "gentleman residing
in the Temple" who later passed them on to Waller for his
own use. Subsequently Waller, realising the value of the process,
attempted to market it elsewhere and published his own version
of its discovery in order to conceal the subterfuge. Finally,
the "keen friends" who Horne claimed extracted the secret
from Waller may well have been Huntsman's rivals, the Walker family.
What is certain is that the controversy over cast steel was real,
and that much was at stake. Waller's appeal obviously fell on
deaf ears, as Huntsman continued to increase his trade and reputation,
while the name of John Waller and the London cutlers faded away.
|